Sox Want John Farrell, Do You?

by Denton on October 6, 2012

Remember when the Red Sox became obsessed with guys like Renteria and Lugo? And remember how it worked out? Seems they have the same man-crush on John Farrell to come back to Boston as skipper. Just like the players I mentioned, I don’t see the fascination with Farrell.

Terry Francona was fired because “he lost control of the clubhouse.” Valentine was brought in to fix that. and the Red Sox finished with their worst record in 50 years. Now the Red Sox want to put John Farrell in charge, a guy that took an 85-77 (2010) Toronto team and has led them to back-to-back losing seasons.

If you need more reasons why I don’t want Farrell back, check out Peter Abraham’s story today:

But the Blue Jays have seen their team earned run average climb since Farrell became manager. Toronto had a 4.22 ERA in 2010. It went to 4.32 in 2011, and 4.64 this season. The ERA of their starting pitchers has jumped by half a run since Farrell took over.

***

More damaging were the allegations veteran infielder Omar Vizquel made late in the season that the Blue Jays were a sloppy team on the field.

 ***
 Toronto also made news in September when infielder Yunel Escobar was suspended for three games after taking the field with a homophobic slur written on his eye black in Spanish. Farrell said at the time that it went unnoticed. It added to the perception that the Jays were poorly disciplined.
Doesn’t sound like a guy that’s going to fix everything that’s broken with the Red Sox. Take a pass on Farrell and keep looking.
7 comments
Flatsixes
Flatsixes like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

I've thought about it some more, and the answer is still "no."

I suggest that they jump at the opportunity to hire me while I'm still available.

Of course, there'll be free tickets (3rd base line) for all Surviving Grady readers.

Thank you for your support.

hannah82
hannah82 like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

I still think we should all get together and manage the team as a group. I think we're qualified.

GaryGeiger
GaryGeiger

I don't get the fascination w/Farrell.  It was under his watch that both Beckett & Lester became cutter happy and lost velocity off their 4 seamers.  Obviously Beckett's conditioning (or lack of) & Lester becoming stubborn and dour didn't help but Farrell had no effect on that either.  

Orsillo doing the play-by-play for A's - Tigers on TBS.  

Sox_GHGirl75
Sox_GHGirl75

You bring up a good point about the Red Sox and their obsessions.   Aside from Renteria and Lugo, there was Dice-K, who they fixated to the tune of a $50 million posting fee just to talk with him, and Gonzalez, who they traded after less than 2 seasons.    If what we've read about the clubhouse issues in Toronto are true, the Sox could be jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire.    I don't recall any of their obsessions  actually working out in the long run.    And to give up a decent player or prospect to a division rival?   That would compound the stupidity.    It's not 2007 anymore, Red Sox!   

Previous post:

Next post: